I have three memberships with Bunq: a private ("P") one and two companies ("C1", "C2"). This issue is mostly about P and C1
Just now I setup the company membership C1 on a new phone by entering the associated email address, the pincode (let's say 1234) and confirming the email. At this point, 1234 was a valid pincode for this membership since else I wouldn't have received the email with confirmation link.
Then I went on to accept a direct debit request. It asked for my pin since biometrics hadn't been setup yet. i entered 1234 and it got rejected. I tried a couple more times and I even think I tried my P-membership pincode (let's say 9876, since I was already suspecting something). Nothing worked. So a pincode that was valid just seconds ago is no longer accepted.
It also wasn't accepted when switching profiles - essentially I got locked out of my account, again (third time in less than 2 months now)
I checked a different phone where I still had Bunq installed and it wouldn't accept 1234 there either. So I chose to reset the pincode (getting an email, a handscan, etc) and set it, again, to 1234 and verified I could login with 1234
Then I went back to the new phone and tried the 1234 pin but, again, it wouldn't accept it. But it did accept my P-account pincode 9876.
My pivate account P is forcibly "linked" to C1 since I'm director and I suspect Bunq is something weird with access checks and pincodes. I think this is possibly related to the login issues I've had in the past where I wasn't able to login in the past (twice now)
I want separate pincodes for separate memberships. I don't want pincodes to magically change. I know this isn't as important as counting trees, but can Bunq please get its act straight here? I don't feel like being locked out for a third time but came pretty close to it
For what it's worth, I'm also director for C2 but not through my P account - I'd prefer this, the total separation of accounts. I suspect it will also fix part of my notification counter madness, but for some reason this is not possible.