Without complete openness of all parties, in this case bunq and the person involved, it will always remain a mystery whether the dissolution of the agreement between bunq and the person bunq justified by bunq . All the documents shared by the person concerned do indeed appear to work to his advantage. But does the person involved share everything? Or only the positive (er) messages?
Personally, I find it interesting that the media has picked this all up. It did not end up just like that.
I also believe that it should be 'over' slowly. Bunq and the person involved will have to fight this out themselves. I do think that bunq will get a bit of a 'slap' if the decomposition turns out to be unjustified. But yes, why would a company 'kick' someone out? It does not yield anything, so they will surely have had 'real trouble' from the person in question.