• Ideas
  • Feature request: Pack owner can govern the distribution of the 10K cap.

After reading up on the discussion about the Massinterest cap within a pack (and asking some questions privately - thanks for the clear answers from bunq!!!), I thought it would be a nice feature in line with the freedom of choice principles, when a pack owner can set the distribution of the Massinterest caps amongst the different pack members. In this way, the cap could be lowered for a pack member that doesn’t keep a high balance, and raised for those members that keep more money in their accounts. The only thing that needs to be worked out is how often you can ‘switch’ or perhaps even leave that up to the pack owner and dampen the urge to switch continuously by ruling that the cap is lowered to ZERO on every day a re-distribution is set up.

I am very curious about bunq’s thoughts on this request, both concerning technical possibilities and how bunq views this from a business-case standpoint.

    Great idea!
    Any comments, bunq?

      @Stichting-Opel-Super-Six-Golden-Wolf#72170
      0.27% de 10000,00 = 27€
      Le combat pour 27,00 Euro

      "No comment"

        @BigBoss#72982 This. To be honest cap at 2500 or 10000 euros shouldn‘t be the discussion, but that there is a cap at all (especially at such a low level).

        At my other German bank account, I admittedly get only 0,2% interest, but that is up to 100k per account, and you can have two.

        For me that is not really relevant to be honest, I never wished for interest on a checking account but if you‘re gonna do it... why like this? It feels like it‘s just a small rebate on the monthly price that can be used as an excuse to do away with the „no investments“ from before.

        I‘m not saying that that were their motives when introducing this, but that‘s what it comes across as. And in the end, 2500€ cap or 10000€ cap... this will butter no parsnips.

          A question now that MassInterest can be toggled ON or OFF:
          How does a member of a pack toggling the MassInterest to OFF effect the distribution of the MassInterest cap among the rest of the pack-members?

            Write a Reply...