@RalphXD#199729 Same here.. I thought it went away once but now I checked through all of my support requests a d there's still a (1) on the support badge.

Hallo Allen,

Ik heb John zijn tweet opgezocht en opnieuw nagevraagd, want zo te zien staat Bunq nog steeds niet tussen de Trustly Trusted Trustees of zo.

Terugkomend op iets wat ik eerder in deze thread las - Bunq heeft inmiddels wel iDin en houdt zelfs bij elke keer dat je ergens met iDin inlogt.

Wachtend op reply van Trustly op twitter,
Jeremy

Hi @trustly It's been almost three times longer than you promised and still I can't use @bunq through your "pay-in" product. Can you tell us what's going on?

Thanks,
Jeremy
– Jeremy (@jmrumble) September 21, 2020
https://twitter.com/jmrumble/status/1308049443141410816

I think that's the Dutch word "beer 🐻" which means "bear 🐻" in English. (Because "Stichting" is Dutch for "Foundation". Fyi Dutch for "Beer 🍻" is "Bier 🍻")

@Jeremy-Navy-Frog#168837 Sorry @Amber I meant @AmberBambi

@Ambiebambi#155275 Seconded!

I second @amber

Allow users to select their own nomenclature, a-la personal pronouns? I personally like the word tribe because it calls up a notion of family and have used it with friends for a number of years now... But I can imagine people might also like to use other terms.

Another graph bug or same bug perhaps:
On a day with no transactions, the graph reports a balance from two days earlier (which had subsequently changed) and then the next day after the bugged report, the balance reported is six cents off, which I've been combing my books trying to locate for the past half-day until I took a calculator to the graph.

Is there a way to see pre-post account balance on transactions rather than using the graph?
Trying to learn bookkeeping in my spare time using my personal finances (to make sense of the concepts) but having an error in the numbers and worse, not knowing if I can trust the numbers reported in my bank account, bugs me.